InvestorsHub Logo

insearchof

06/17/20 6:12 PM

#302293 RE: Justfactsmam #302288

Makes sense; thank you.
JMHO
$IPIX

GreenBioAnalyst

06/17/20 6:30 PM

#302304 RE: Justfactsmam #302288

Severe vs critically ill are two different criteria of cv19 (sequela) patients. They're not the same. Understand this.
He definitely needs a CMO advisor. At least severe since that's where ARDS, pneumonia, and SEPSIS that Bril can address.
So he's just gonna just sit and milk the phase II results using grant funding?
That's bad advice. You cannot maximize shareholders' wealth without taking risks for both severe and critically ill patients. The primary endpoints are now secondary. I'm sure our results with Bril in mortality rate will be better than REMDESIVIR (THRASH).

I can guarantee you that Bril is as good or even better than Leronlimmab. BUT NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO SECOND GUESS BRIL'S 3-IN-1 ACTION. SEIZE THE DAY! LET THE JUGGERNAUT DOES ITS THING IN CV19 PATIENTS!

farrell90

06/17/20 9:37 PM

#302365 RE: Justfactsmam #302288

I agree, early treatment is the key. I could see 3 arms:
1. high risk patients who test positive but have minimal symptoms
2. low risk patient who test positive with early pulmonary symptoms
3. Combination treatment Brilacidin + a second drug to be chosen by Dr Fauci for patients with moderate pulmonary symptoms , but before intubation for pulmonary failure.

GLTA Farrell