InvestorsHub Logo

ghmm

06/17/20 4:56 PM

#233150 RE: DewDiligence #233145

BMRN:

There are a couple of observations I had about the release that I posted on twitter.
First to put in context of SOC I'm in the camp that believes its a tremendous advance and even with durability questions they will get meaningful commercial sales.
1-The PR was quite cheezy in what they did with the graphics!
https://twitter.com/MauriceOnTW/status/1273269482065203203?s=20
Fortunately you can get higher res images from here
https://twitter.com/MauriceOnTW/status/1273330596593504257?s=20
2-The four year high dose data mean 24.2/median 16.4 is a bit misleading (perhaps the reason for the power slide resolution?) as it includes just 6/7. If one goes by the 3 year 9 month reading looks to be about mean 20/median 12
https://twitter.com/MauriceOnTW/status/1273291002074345472?s=20
3-The data is not going to be reflective of commercial dose as Phase 3 interim data (what BMRN used to file on) produced very notably lower expression levels.