LOL? Seriously?
Just to be clear, the motivation and medical judgment of the "shareholder doctor" in recommending this trial of this drug that is part of that doctor's stock portfolio (and a speculative one, at best) is compromised. That "shareholder doctor" is beyond "influenced."
My "end game" is very clear, and it started when the "shareholder doctor" mentioned offering patients to this drug trial from a company in the stock portfolio, and encouraging other "doctor shareholders" to do that, with the objective of advancing the trial and potentially the share price of the stock. The "end game" is simple: that doctor needs end the conflict of interest by either divesting the stock or sending the patients to doctors whose medical judgment is not compromised by the stock holding.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
