Replies to post #3775 on Nano Magic Inc. (NMGX)

[BJ_Cooper]

“There were no promoters, no promotions, no manipulations, no nonsense; simply caring about the facts rather than asking questions to fit an incorrect narrative would have revealed these fundamental truths about Nano Magic.”

[Scramus]

As I understand it fast track is FDA not EPA.
The MSDA safety data sheet says experimental mostly.
Did this company bother to look?
Needs additional argument support in my opinion.

[Snip]
"Magic with EPA call included company background, company products, available
information about povidone-iodine, the reregistration process for povidone-iodine, likely
registration process for Halo, EPA considerations to fast-track COVID-19 products,
likely timelines, EPA process for package review, and fees. This breadth of topics is a
one and one-half hour substantive call.
Nano Magic came into the call understanding that using povidone-iodine in Halo
may enable access to a fast track process available for products that could be used against
COVID-19. The company learned about limitations to the process, given the EPA’s
23
obligation to assess the safety of products, even if data about COVID-19 efficacy existed.
The conversation ended with Nano Magic informing the EPA that the company would
revisit – not abandon – its short-term and long-term product to market strategy."

[TenKay]

Lol...the lawyer certainly is flamboyant in his prose. Does he think that is going to help sway the commission?

[T4KingOff]

Does it always take this long for a decision?