Thinking errors over and over again:
The suggestion by shorters that this ERHC insider and majority owner now suddenly wants to get out of ERHC, but found himself 'stuck' with his majority percentage, just when the end of this successful trajectory is in sight, is a hilarious suggestion.
"Link please to prove any interest of purchasing erhc by Total (or anyone else).
Without that, the entire bullish case is nothing but bs repeated again and again for over 3 years."
I think some corners are cut here, to use an understatement. So because you think you have no link to any interest by TOTAL in ERHC, it's BS. Ah, that makes sense, doesn't it?
The major problem for shorters is that ERHC is seriously undervalued. It's a insurmountable problem for them.
The insider entity or person(s) that paid for, and invested time into the 400 plus pages of litigation regarding just EEZ block 4 is probably (lol) of the 'opinion' (lol) that the litigation is worthwhile cost-benefit wise. This entity or person is of course an insider, with all the information at hand to make a sound judgement whether or not this is all worthwhile. This insider information very likely contains high interest by TOTAL in block 4 of the EEZ... hence the contract. It's hardly rocket science.
The Doctor.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
