Replies to post #10867 on NanoLogix Inc (NNLX)

[Emerald Isle]

Medical veteran,

So, urine, sweat and feces are safe, but a trace of saliva is not? Makes no sense. Do you imagine the proposed Nanologix home test to be a deadly threat in every possible way? You do know that if someone has a virus, it can be transmitted through practically any bodily fluid? Reread the SteriCycle guidelines. How about if someone simply expectorates into a vial instead of using a swab? What would you suggest to do with that person’s tongue and lips for disinfecting afterwards? Just curious.

My opinion is everyone should consider the importance of being able to test at home.

EI

[Down_Home_Texan]

BigDinDallas tried to point this out to you earlier.

"Description

Same test used by professionals
Oral swab test does not require blood
Results in just 20 minutes

The OraQuick In-Home HIV Test offers people clinically proven results in just 20 minutes in the comfort and privacy of their homes.

It empowers them to take the critical first step in learning their HIV status. OraQuick was approved by the FDA on July 3, 2012 for use by adults 17 years of age or older."

I am not a medical professional but I do believe HIV is a virus.

[exploremore]

Yours is a straw man argument. Don't know if I should explain how to use Google or just post links, if you have trouble opening these let me know. There's more if you need them;

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/08/us/covid-19-at-home-saliva-test/index.html

https://www.cnet.com/health/how-to-get-tested-for-coronavirus-at-home/

https://www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/at-home-covid-19-test

Both sides are missing the sample is key. One saliva test has been approved, saliva , blood/ sputum / urine all would be a better way to collect a sample then a nasal swab, if approved, especially for NNLX home test as it has vaguely been described. Discussion moot with no test or some details. Vaguely described doesn't begin to describe how little is known.

[exploremore]

Yours is a straw man argument. Don't know if I should explain how to use Google or just post links, if you have trouble opening these let me know. There's more if you need them;

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/08/us/covid-19-at-home-saliva-test/index.html

https://www.cnet.com/health/how-to-get-tested-for-coronavirus-at-home/

https://www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/at-home-covid-19-test

Both sides are missing the sample is key. One saliva test has been approved, saliva , blood/ sputum / urine all would be a better way to collect a sample then a nasal swab, if approved, especially for NNLX home test as it has vaguely been described. Discussion moot with no test or some details. Vaguely described doesn't begin to describe how little is known.