InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jonesieatl

12/15/06 11:44 AM

#104143 RE: brewskih #104141

I would have to agree with your take on Cornell's participation ...

... but then, what do I know about that stuff.

jonesie

p.s. Cornell did indeed make millions off the financing deals with Neomedia, not sure they'd be overly worried about anything at all right now.
icon url

uofalbany

12/15/06 12:12 PM

#104150 RE: brewskih #104141

brew wrote: Cornell does not have any control over management, they merely hold the assets of NEOM as collateral

uof writes: Well, you must be in denial, if you don't think their opinion and influence and collateral holdings don't creep into the equation slightly.

brew wrote: I think, but may be wrong, they dont even have a seat on the board

uof write: Refrain from making a bold statement like this, if you are not sure. How about checking with the management? Then, get back to us on the results.

As for your recent request, possible revenue streams (which are numerous) have been covered by posters and myself a million times over. Go back and review the posts, and then get back to me.


icon url

wildbill1

12/15/06 1:04 PM

#104166 RE: brewskih #104141

officially, no, cornell does not have a seat on the board, etc. but make no mistake..they called the shots on the layoffs last friday, and they do have "yea or nay" power, IMO, on major company transactions, such as selling the subs (don't believe for a second they're not sticking their noses in the sale of paint, and could be a reason it's taking longer than expected) I never said there was a $30 million loan-if I used the term loan it was in error...it is not equity however (the 27 million plus owed)..it's a hybrid liability (warrants, etc) on the balance sheet, and acts more like a loan than equity. interest is accruing on the $27 million outstanding. check the Q for details...you'll notice they took valuation adjustments every quarter on this liability, due to the stock price falling.
you're right..they've made a bunch of money on this company...but they do have $27 million "owed" to them by NEOM, which does, by my definition, put it "at risk"--which gives cornell even more room to "call the shots", IMO
I wish NEOM would get a new source of funding, but i don't think that will happen....
i agree..pps will not be rising to any appreciable level short term, which is why cornell, in order to get the $27 million paid down, will be selling, IMO, most if not all the subs..no other way to ensure the $$ are paid by NEOM, since it has no cash...obviously i could be wrong, but i've seen other companies with venture capital groups go down the same path, and again, the venture capital group has called the shots, so to speak, in all cases.