-- so you decided to mention it again because? Incredible as it sounds, I don't read and analyze every post though I my best.
Regardless, I merely passed along the opinion of another who was baffled why BLDV is reporting a 3 year old, higher share count as being the "float"... exactly 470 million shares higher than the current "unrestricted" number (aka Float).
How did BLDV shed those shares if they actually did? That's my question. Is this the screw up responsible for the return of the YIELD sign yet again?