RSHN did not amend their articles of organization to change any officers, therefore the RS amendment signed by someone who is not authorized for the company means that filing would be null and void. Think a little harder.
Sure, I will give you that the filing was probably done to pull a fast one on someone (Maybe even without RG's knowledge), or to get the stock to become liquid (hence the dump that day, and possible accumulation of more shares by management) but the RS amendment was never going to be held up because Hainey was not an authorized officer/member/manager of RSHN.
RSHN has never claimed to have 500,000 acres. It was New Earth Development who was looking to develop that acreage for their business plan. Now New Earth is gone, so you don't ever have to state the fallacy that RSHN claimed to have 500k acres again.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
