Zandant, yes all those are relative questions.
What is results after 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours. What proximity to infection works best or does not matter at all? Dosage of what was used, how many times and at what dosage worked the best? I assume like most of us in business we all have baseline criteria to follow when results are being calculated from new examples against the baseline are attempting to be achieved or a certain positive result/outcome one wants to see in such a test/tests being done. In our world it is mathematical using spreadsheets, in laboratory testing I assume it is test after test using varying degrees of dosage, time/duration minutes even second perhaps. Positive and Negative results recorded. It seems odd that when testing is done a PR release just glosses over those resultant factors and gives the 10,000 foot view versus some in the weeds details about what worked and what did not work, perhaps that is intellectual property stuff as well that is for in house only or when a white paper is written about it. Just my two cents but you make good points here as I am a numbers person and details type of person so like to know these things to fully understand methodologies and what worked and did not work and why. Thanks. GO IPIX
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
