InvestorsHub Logo

DragonBear

05/06/20 9:34 AM

#123099 RE: PINKribbon #123092

Cornell could very well fund our CT-wrong

However, it would be indirectly by way of monies coming from philanthropy and/or donors.



And what's preventing that from happening right now? Other than they don't exist.

In the past year the speculation of who was going to provide funding for the mythical CT has been:

Large Pharma - pick a name.

PCAN. NIH.

Yuen funding out of his own pocket. Or some strange merger involving his company.

And now philanthropy and/or donors. Looping back to Cornell. No doubt with friends of Hidalgo funding the mythical CT?

About the only thing missing is "Go-Fund-Me".

Oh yeah, and nevermind O’Leary’s version, a version “specific to the procedure”.



Oh yeah, wow specific. How to inject the CIABs into a catheter tube, during a Angioplasty operation.

Just “anutter” copy and paste should do it ...like a universal manual....like one size fits all, right?



Yep. Stick the ole catheter tube into the artery, and proceed to the target. Nothing new. Then one can insert or deliver the CIABs. In the case of RenovoRx, intra-arterial delivery of Gemcitabine. Through a double balloon catheter.

How many ways can you puncture the skin, and insert a catheter into an artery? That's right- one size with minor tweaks does fit all. And to think it only took the last 3 yrs to figure out how to document the implanting of CIABs. Something that was already documented from the Lohr ad hoc trials of 1999.

Soooo complicated. Sooooo hilarious.