InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rawman

04/23/20 12:53 PM

#75004 RE: cvinvestor #74922

But to issue the PRs he is issuing without having previously validated the design would just make him money he couldn't enjoy from jail.


Rest assured CEO Keith Berman's PR's are always carefully worded such that regulator "accountability" will never be an issue! Avoiding "accountability" is also the reason Berman never publicly discloses Material Events, such as posting the FDA letters related to DECN's FDA Pre-EUA and EUA Authorization Applications!

2 weeks ago, on April 7, Berman was touting the notion DECN was in search of a U.S. testing lab. Apparently DECN hasn't found a suitable one or all the candidates have said,

"Kiss off Keith! We don't have the time to screw around with your re-purposed blood glucose meter!"

Although a commonplace caveat, I suggest reviewing the "forward-looking statement disclaimer" that is included in every Berman PR!
icon url

Jelly Bean

04/23/20 2:43 PM

#75105 RE: cvinvestor #74922

But to issue the PRs he is issuing without having previously validated the design would just make him money he couldn't enjoy from jail.



Plausible deniability! That is all berman needs. He is careful enough to word PR's that give him wiggle room. He has done it many times in the past. SEC is not interested in taking down companies like this. Not worth their time. But, hey, you never know.
icon url

IPwatcher

04/23/20 3:01 PM

#75112 RE: cvinvestor #74922

But to issue the PRs he is issuing without having previously validated the design would just make him money he couldn't enjoy from jail



Read the PRs VERY carefully.
"believes this..." ... not 'knows this'
"anticipates that..." ... not 'has shown that'
"Designed to..." ...not 'does'
"intended to..." ... not 'will!'

It is very difficult to disprove whether someone believed something at that time.
Very few anticipated Covid 19. Its very hard to convict someone on the basis of the future not turning out as they 'anticipated'.
It is very difficult to prove that something that doesn't 'work' in a certain way was not 'designed to work' in a certain way, and just failed to ...(if failure was a crime, now Berman would have been got the chair long since!).

I suspect he may finally have overreached himself this time and it may come back on him, but he's been doing this nonsense for years and it barely has yet!

And there's also this:

would just make him money
Him? Where DOES the money go?
A link between those who profit from the scam and Berman himself has to be definitively established before he can be pinned to it himself, and - apart from a few message board posters who brag about making a killing hereabouts - who knows who is actually profiting, and how? That level of forensic accounting is above my pay grade. I'll keep to the Science!
There's enough holes in that to see this for what it is!