Do shareholders still not understand the process?.......Geez
For years your's truly has shared copies of the permits as well as the reports. No one else does, and I get it, but the process is laid out in easy to understand English in the permit.
Just as they "shared" with the Bureau the mag surveys, they'll "share" the Tinkerbell 2.0 surveys too. It's a requirement.
They identify the targets they wish to investigate and submit it to the Bureau in written form.
They go and inspect, then if they want to investigate more, they identify the new targets.
That's what's so laughable about the update. They've claimed, even without metal detectors Tinkerbell 2.0 could see a chest that contained copper coins, determine it's size, as well as the angle in which it was beneath the surface.
None of that was in the update. They need to go and investigate? Why?
Those aren't trick questions.
The update should have said something like.....we see 5 golden rings, 4 french goblets, 3 silver platters, 2 chest of gold, and a partridge in a pear tree.
Further it should have said, we submitted the findings to the Bureau and will verify our findings in the near future.
It appears Tinkerbell 2.0 does okay in a very controlled environment, but not so well in the real world. It certainly isn't living up t the hype.
They admitted they've only surveyed 1.25 sq miles, which is laughable as well.
But there's nothing new here as they start their 3rd decade on a very small area. Why do you think HTQ moved on like the previous salvors?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
