Read the USC regarding patents and the years that the patent owner did not recieve benefit of the patent.It is in plain English and you do not have to be a lawyer to comprehend the words. You do have to put time into completing your own due diligence.
Then go back and read what counsel said years ago about what the path would be after a positive ruling is granted WDDD. Again, plain English.
I am not counsel (refer to USC).... but if you have a positive ruling from Judge Caspers court; and patents have run out of time; but you have not received the benefit of the patents; and you have completed all requirements by law to keep the patents valid throughout the years; It would seem to me you ask the courts to restore your benefit of the patent(s) to the end of the life of the patent. In other words if a patent is 15 years; and you never received compensation during those 15 years; then you would cite the USC and other case law to receive 15 additional years.
Again in my opinion WDDD has lost nothing. Yes the longs will have to wait a while longer to receive there day in court. Yes noone likes this fact. All longs want a ROI. Add into that counsel has won many cases for large sums of money against some of the largest IT companies in the US. Counsel has also taken this case on contingency after studying the case for nine months before agreeing to take the case.
I encourage all longs to read the United States Code, USC, that applies to patents. Then review counsels background, the law firms back ground, and decide for yourself.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
