Call it whatever you want, FnF having negative $170B of core capital at the end of 2019 is a fact. Saying otherwise is a false narrative.
How can I "understand" something that is false? Treasury returning $125B (or $130B) does not recap FnF while the senior prefs exist. Core capital would still be negative!
It would take the seniors being converted to a form of equity that counts towards core capital (commons and non-cumulative prefs) to finish the recap. Treasury is never going to both send $125B and cancel the seniors, it will be one or the other. Each of the two results in significant dilution to the commons.
We are years away from a final court ruling that would force Treasury to send this $125B. Calabria and Mnuchin don't have that kind of time.
FnF not being able to buy back their own shares is a fact, not a story. I proved it in this post.
And how can you try to make a point by citing FnF's earnings, which appear in SEC filings, while ignoring the same SEC filings that say their core capital is negative $170B? Pick a lane.