Replies to post #33627 on Pacific Ventures Group Inc (PACV)

[tutankhamuns]

They could’ve chosen a much lower split ratio. There’s very little justification for effectuating the maximum reduction on such a decent SS.

It explains why they didn’t address the R/S in any of the PRs that were disseminated since it was announced...

It’s truly unfortunate, but I had a feeling it was coming.

$PACV