Replies to post #185554 on OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp (OWCP)

[axelvento]

OS : 294.915.633+24.758.573 April.....

good structure!

Now we wait fo, next week

Alright. Give me the patent number now

[I-Glow]

I have already posted real DD that proves OWCP doesn't have to file a 8-K to announce they received a Wells Notice.

"Yes, the non-existent Wells Notice would require an 8-K."

Why post information that I have proven isn't true - OWCP doesn't have to disclose they received a Wells Notice - post your DD to prove they have to file a 8-K - because I am going to post real DD to prove that isn't true.

"When a company receives a Wells notice from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, whether or not it needs to disclose that to the public has been an open question for some time. Many did, but some did not.

Now a recent district court ruling sheds some light on the decision, ruling that under many circumstances a company has no automatic obligation to notify the public that it received a Wells notice."

https://www.complianceweek.com/court-no-obligation-to-disclose-receipt-of-a-wells-notice/4221.article

"Disclosure of Wells Notices Not Required by Section 10(b)

A recent decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has held that Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 does not require companies to disclose their receipt of a Wells Notice."

https://www.kkwc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/disclosureofwellsnotices.pdf

As usual I was right once again - by posting real DD.

IG