Replies to post #101113 on BioAmber Inc fka BIOAQ

[randomwalk007]

But who owns Bioamber Inc? What makes you think all these filings are for the benefit of BIOAQ shareholders? Unfortunately, it remains very opaque and non-definitive.

Iron Eagle, we all appreciate the positive DD and filings and keeping the lamp lit.

Hoping you are right as I would love to have some dry powder to put back to work in this market.

[Real McCoy]

Trying to show patent documents as evidence of an otherwise completely unannounced deal is just nowhere.

The leaps in logic required are astounding. The board would have had to have approved such a deal long ago before resigning. Then the Monitor would have to write 13 reports completely omitting any discussion of such deal while going into agonizing detail on another one.

That the court would allow such a deal to be hidden while the stock gets delisted, meaning the public does not have an opportunity to weigh such information in an investment decision, is ludicrous.

[THEDOG 17]

Good Things Are Coming Very Very Soon!! Is in Denial! Dang

[trader59]

So, if all of those are "in denial," then it is agreed all those patents were sold in the liquidation.

Read through that link of the USTPO showing the updates to the ownership have been submitted? Does that mean anything?

It took a full 14 months to update the land registry. What was the expected timetable to get the patents to reflect the rightful owner? Why does it matter since they clearly were sold in the liquidation and the new owners can use/do whatever the processes were without any sort of fear of being accused of "infringing?"