No there hasn’t been a ‘bad ruling’ at all. There has been the ‘correct ruling’ as we all knew all along.
VPLM never had a thing but a share selling scheme. Enough general IP to get a court process going, which always takes a long time. But the IP has always had zero actual value to make any actual claims.
They KNEW this, they counted on it. This was the design, sell shares while this bogus IP they could show they owned, but couldn’t make claims. So they sold the idea they these patents have value, when they never did.
This was the entire design all along. Perpetrated by a framework of insiders and paid promotions.
This has always been, is, and continues to the true definition of a scam. Not a ‘well we failed court’ at all. That was always known and always inevitable. The definition of a scam has intent to deceive for gain. Most OTC just high risk business with MM and toxic funders taking advantage. Outcome is quite often failure. True scams though are more rare. A designed illusion to make money for insiders.
VPLM has always been a true scam.