Replies to post #46459 on United Western Bancorp Inc (fka UWBKQ)

[fredscott36]

..............REALITY.............based upon FACTS, ma'am..................

...........FDIC did not show up in court, which the justices noted for the record.............not showing up is ASKING TO LOSE......and the FDIC did rule against the FDIC, 9-0.............but Neil did give the FDIC a "remand"...............revisit....................BOB RICHARDS IS NOT COMMON LAW..........................so the door is now wide open......................no TSA, then put the case thru the test gauntlet............state agency, debtor-creditor................in or outside of BK...............EZ...........economic driver of a "group" gets the refund which is a "payment" in the eyes of the law.......just needs to be cleaned up, and not using BOB RICHARDS, imo........

......you had a TSA, ms. newtogame......................even though BOB RICHARDS was applied, which technically enabled you to file a RELATOR, appeal to the SCOTUS.......and HOGAN LOVELLS took the case and has a close relationship with the SCOTUS (Neal handed it off to a grunt)................

......time to deal with the GREATNESS of mark e. haynes............and you also posted, ms. newtogame, that we would stay in litigation until we passed the 10-year mark, allowing the FDIC to quash the case records..........(we believe the BK creates a 'stay', so the 10-year time frame hasn't even begun - - and the FDIC stated to me that they are no longer involved with uwbi, in any capacity, whatsoever........these AHs are chronic liars, so believe the opposite of what they tell me)........................