InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PaperProphet

12/09/06 11:23 AM

#3611 RE: 1stepahead1 #3610

Thanks. I think I'm starting to see the thought processes involved. Hopefully you don't mind if I keep pressing. It's places like these where my thought processes seem to take a big detour from everyone else's and I'm not exactly sure why. When I first read that excerpt from the 10-QSB, I thought to myself, "This is materially different from what was said in the Kingswell Sales PR and this once again reinforces my opinion that Mr. Huffman is an absolute dirtbag." For you and everyone else, however, it doesn't seem like a big deal at all even though one piece of information says "Sale!!" and the other says "conditions need to be satisfied so the sale didn't happen yet." I get the impression that PR's leave shareholders with some nebulous notion that 'things are moving forward' and shareholders don't necessarily ever remember or validate the information given.

Now that I specifically contrast the two pieces of information, does it bother you a little that the 10-QSB says something materially different than the PR?




icon url

Residuum1

12/09/06 12:03 PM

#3612 RE: 1stepahead1 #3610

Kingswell? The Maryland firm that

...still appears in state records as a forfeited trade name--nearly seven months after expiration?

See http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=14796238



"'The second contract is with Kingswell Funding LLC'...I expected the deal to be solidified after certification."