InvestorsHub Logo

Brooge warrants cancelled

03/06/20 4:26 PM

#596280 RE: navycmdr #596275

Freddie recovered 8 cents after hours ?

955

03/06/20 6:44 PM

#596298 RE: navycmdr #596275

FHFA KAPUT???

In FHFA, there is no such ambiguity. The wording is "for cause," and based on Seila's hearings, the outcome seems pretty straightforward to me.

Unconstitutional structure, no severability; therefore, the whole FHFA needs to be stricken down. This is what Collins means by "issues with broader significance."



Calabria's out of a job???









Donotunderstand

03/06/20 7:03 PM

#596306 RE: navycmdr #596275

?
why no (simple) severability


And note ---- based on what court decision anywhere do you think how FHFA acted (in your opinion) v consumer agency acted has a single drop of impact on the issue which is the singular CEO for cause

DCBill

03/06/20 7:08 PM

#596312 RE: navycmdr #596275

Of course, the SCOTUS knows the relationship between Selia and Collins.

And you have conflict ting philosophies working on the court, too.

So look for the Court to try and minimize governmental disruption (and save Treasury money).

Now it's on you lawyers to figure out what that translates to for Collins.

(There is a reason why MC seems confident of no major shareholder benefit. He and the nine judges know the Trump Admin also is drowning in red ink.)

Louie_Louie

03/06/20 9:38 PM

#596344 RE: navycmdr #596275

Excellent breakdown and analysis! It is amazing to me that they bonded both cases together for the SCOTUS review....how? It is not apples to apples legal situation comparison, so how can SCOTUS rule on either? It would seem to put the justices in a catch 22 situation.
Really hoping this all comes to fruition as you have written and we see the light.