Over reaction in my opinion. It's an appeal, the patents will be scrutinized, that's the whole point. I believe VoIP-Pal attorney presented cases that identify previous similar situations. That's all you can do in 15 minutes in my opinion. Twitters attorney references were scrutinized as well. I appreciate the fact when the one judge brought up Voip-Pal success @ PTAB IPR challenges and other cases that support VoIP-Pals claims.
Seriously? You heard the judges continually say the claims are abstract upon abstract and that the claim language itself doesn't include any specificity which is exactly why it failed Alice.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
