Replies to post #35925 on Mexus Gold US (MXSG)

[T-Hawk]

Look, you're a knowledgeable and credible poster. I don't fault the optimism (and probably appreciate it more than you realize).

Where I am unable to empathize is with the accepting a PR as documentation that production has begun. How many times has this claim been made, only to not pan out in reality? I can understand second chances if it were a one-off event, but this cycle has played out multiple times.

8-k or 10-Q/10-K is the only way these claims of sales and/or production get taken seriously going forward.

PT lost his credibility. You don't get that back by continuing to make the same PR claims without also providing the documentation to substantiate those claims. PT knows this.

So why put out a PR without the other documentation to back it up? The most logical reason is they need the pump for some reason.

[bobbyinredwood]

Yes a picture is worth a thousand words. Hard for anyone to explain this sattelite image of Santa Elana as a scam unless of course you think Google Maps is on on it too.

[A Dinosaur]

I just called PT to congratulate him on his success. He's very happy with the electrowinning process. The whole system is running smoothly. Should be frequent, probably weekly, gold sales from now on.

To paraphrase 8, "I'm pleased."

Dino

[gitreal]

PT knows what Elena has to offer.

Apparently he has chosen to ignore the dismal Argo drilling and the even more dismal Mexus drilling. Or he simply doesn't understand how to interpret drilling results. For example.....you cannot mine "noticeable results".

I don’t think PP’s and lenders conversions are a part of the picture anymore.

Really? The PP's and toxic notes have not gone away. And the need for funds to cover operating costs have not gone away. Only 13 days until the next big note hits. And still no proof of any gold sold.

The Mexus PR's always seem to have forward looking language....."arranging for sale", anticipating production, expecting, hoping, and so on.