InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

OTC_Buyer

03/01/20 4:42 PM

#104500 RE: RMS555 #104499

The business in question from that statement is not a brick and mortar store front from my understanding ... why reply to non-customers who just want to complain? I wouldn’t.
icon url

davied25

03/01/20 5:19 PM

#104503 RE: RMS555 #104499

Your logic continues to be so flawed, I'm truly sorry that you aren't using your brain because you could really use that passion and brain power for something useful.

Using your logic, if one of the assets is fake, they all have to be fake, otherwise why fake any at all? So if they're all fake, how do you keep the 10 people listed in the disclosures who received preferred shares for their asset purchases quiet for the 2-3 years their shares are restricted? Oh wait, all those people who sold controlling interest in their companies are fake, right? Woops, guess you forgot about Joseph Maenza who is a real person and owns several businesses in Florida in addition to the condo that Exxe owns (and I posted hard proof of the paper trail). Or Duane Phillippi. He must be fake right?



I mean, that’s only two guys right? That surely must mean the rest have to be fake.

Oh yeah, how do pay a securities lawyer like Lowy (who has been involved in many other real companies) a retainer without any incoming cash flow because everything is fake? Or maybe the 5 AXXA employees who signed employment agreements and filed them with the SEC (did you read the A-1?) just did so without ever receiving a single dollar of their salaries from March '19 until now. Wait I forgot, the directors are all fake people too! But if everyone is fake except Boris, and we know he doesn't have any shares (you said it yourself), you really want to convince everyone here he's running a worldwide con with dozens of companies and dozens of people to keep "quiet" for ONLY the very modest salary in his employment agreement?

I mean really? Have you thought about how you sound using the same "phone number and website" argument over and over? Do you see how someone would have to be completely nuts to believe that your scenario is more likely than just accepting that what the company says & does is actually taking place?