A 1,500% arbitrary multiplier is unfortunately indefensible and clearly not supported by the market, whether it's labeled 'conservative' 'aggressive', 'moderate' or 'extra-medium'. It can't hold up against ant quantifiable measure from a legitimate financial analyst. We've broken past Even finally, yesz and made a bit of margin - but why try to come up with these 'flick of the wrist' multipliers, and follow up with 'IT'S NOT UNCOMMON TO SEE 20, 30, 40 TIMES MULTIPLIER IN THE INDUSTRY OR WITH OTHER PENNIES!?'. Why are we so un-willing to be objective on here? It's either 'this is a POS, it's a dirty shell with incompetent leadership heading back to goat days, let me keep reminding everyone of why I feel so', or 'GONNA BLOW, BEARS ARE SCARED, we're a PR away from being the next Bitcoin '...It's clearly neither right now, or maybe both. Yes it's good it didn't suffer a net loss in 2019, yes it's good a Merger came through. But also YES the share structure clearly is severely bloated, YES communication is poor and brushes bad news under the rug leaving too many questions unanswered, and YES the PPS is almost at an all time low until we make $5-$10 Million in annual revenue, gather enough assets of that magnitude, or release a PR that is speculative enough for new investors to outweigh the constant day trading, shorting or dumping holding this PPS down. Why do both sides feel that putting on their blinders and pushing their one-sided view is gonna make anyone jump ship?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
