Using company funds to pay for it doesn't make it a "professional write up." It's a hatchet cut and paste fluff piece. Take some of the laughable lines and google them. There's nothing in there and the way it reads is clunky and sophomoric, at best.
That cluster that reads like the proverbial monkeys at a typewriter had a five martini lunch would scare any sensible person away.
The substance is as much crap as the antiquated format where it was lifted. If $CMGO paid for all that bolding, underlining, ALL-CAPS, and mix-mash of fonts, they should get their money back. Or, they should steal "reports" from someone better than Marian Sabety.
This monstrosity was created last night just before 10PM. Did they not think it worthwhile to vet it?