You can choose to ignore this.
My apologies on my spelling errors. I won't bother to point out the many typos you make/made, I can read around them, and assume others can, too.
The highlighted/bold sections were for everyone else. Your quote lacked the extra bit, that changes the meaning.
I mentioned that I could be wrong about book royalties. I never meant to act as though I know better. This matter is also complicated by who is deemed the creative talent when books are published using non-Dewdney material from the animated episodes (Dewdney, GNUS, writer hired by GNUS?).
So, you are agreeing with me, that the Llama Llama series was selling about a million books a year, before GNUS's Llama Llama animated series came out. I never disputed that GNUS's was able to license LL to help book sales.
As for Llama Llama Live, I pointed out that I was wrong about the potential revenue generating power of this project. I never expected it to do this well. I can admit when I am wrong, but, I didn't think it would cause such a stir.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
