Gers. Not in such a convoluted way Gers was mentioned on that List of Co's! That list did not mention Gers, but only the state of At---'s position, and not Gers position, who was mentioned only as part of Att--'s overall plan of operation! For the greatest part, Att-- got the benefit of the post, not GERS?? How can anyone say the post benefited Gers, when they were not even listed on that group of Co's? If they were listed, then more would be said of Gers's operational status, but they were not even considered, so how that can be relevant?
That post should have been directed to the At--- site, not the Gers site! As for the amount of people who had to tap on the At--- listing to get Gers info, which was already known, amounts to maybe a few, but it was not directed toward the future of Gers, only At---'s future! A much to do about nothing as far as I am concerned! We were but a Side-note as far as that At---'s listing was concerned! Nothing new at all!! Has our Association/Partnership seen any major progress, or any remarkable change in our PPS because Att-- was added to the Gers list of overall actions?
We all know that At--- and Gers have a mutual agreement about certain things, but Gers is not At---, but an independent Co', at least to some degree, and that is where any Gers post should be directed, not in combination with other Co's? Strictly speaking, Gers's owns many products and their Future technological Patents and progress is where it is at, for they are still a Company Entity in itself! That is where my interest lies at least, not with Attis's Partnership which favors At--- far more than it does Gers IMO?
While this relatively new association with Attis means something, Gers gave away far more that what they got, as it was strictly a DISTRESS SELL-OUT, and only a partial one at that!! I want to hear about Gers' patents, one of which was highlighted not to long ago, and the new Licensed Co's, who continue to be added to our list of Royalty payers? IMO only...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
