Replies to post #85217 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[BigE1960]

The idea that QMC QDSC could fail is pure hogwash!

You do know what "could" means, right?

The PRINTING Technology already exists, so QMC does not have to prove the Technology works.

It may exist but there is no evidence QMC possesses any experience doing it or have a way of doing it that is not going to infringe on someone else's IP.

In fact, Dr Jabbour cowrote[sic] a patent for R2R.

What's that patent number? Interesting tidbit- Dr. J has patents with Univ. of Arizona, Kaust, Univ. of Nevada-Reno, Nitto Denko(?), and yet nothing with QMC or even any QMC is gonna go to market with. Hmmm...

QMC Quantum Dots are environmentally resistant to heat, moisture and air, and so can handle weather conditions.

Relative to what? Without the actual test data, third party certifications, test standards referenced (ASTM, ISO, SAE, MIL, etc.), or actual product sales, this claim has alway been dubious.

We know QMC has the Technology and the QD for making QDSC.

You do know what "know" means, right?

I have already explained reasons why QMC has not shown their solar progress yet - especially for business competition reasons.

And those reasons were more like forced rationalizations.

[Kurt_Banoffee]

The idea that QMC QDSC could fail is pure hogwash!

Because QMC has never failed in the past? Nobody has ever demonstrated that what they are doing is possible. Ever. My guess is that's because it's really hard to do. Maybe QMC will be successful, but to claim that there is no chance they could fail is just silly.

The PRINTING Technology already exists, so QMC does not have to prove the Technology works.

The printing technology may already exist, but nobody has proven it can be adapted to make a commercially viable QDSC.

In fact, Dr Jabbour cowrote a patent for R2R.

Are you referring to the screen printing of LEDs patent? Which doesn't mention solar even once nor the flexographic method that QMC has recently said they plan to use? If so, so what? If not, what patent are you talking about?

I have already explained reasons why QMC has not shown their solar progress yet - especially for business competition reasons.

No, all you've done is use this as an excuse for why there is no evidence of the things you're claiming. They have told the world that they plan to make QDSC and that they plan to use high speed R2R flexographic printing. How exactly would telling investors that they have actually tried to do what they say they plan to do hurt their competitive position? How would telling us their efficiency numbers hurt their competitive position? They have done this many times over on the display side yet they are silent on the solar figures? It doesn't add up unless there is nothing to tell. That they haven't tried it yet. Where is any evidence in their financials of the type of cost that would be required of such a test?

For that matter, what competitive position are you concerned about? India? Are you claiming that there is a risk of someone stealing the Amtronics/Amtron deal away from them? Are you claiming that there is a chance that someone could come in and be more competitive than the QMC/Amtronics/Amtron JV? Is that what you think they are scared of?

[Kurt_Banoffee]

The idea that QMC QDSC could fail is pure hogwash! The PRINTING Technology already exists, so QMC does not have to prove the Technology works. In fact, Dr Jabbour cowrote a patent for R2R.

We know QMC has the Technology and the QD for making QDSC.

Recently we've learned that one of the world's leading QDSC researchers is saying 3-5 years to printed QDSC commercialization. Other researchers are saying multiple new technologies need to be developed to make QDSC commercially viable. Still other researchers have commented that commercial QDSC technology doesn't exist today and that it's an open question if high-efficiency polymer solar cell production can even be scaled up from the lab.

There seems to be a large disconnect between the technology believed by some to be possessed by QMC and what leading solar researchers believe.