Is this another situation where a lawyer has put forth a (public) legal letter on a subject that has been controversial enough to provoke the exceptional 10th Monitors report, and this time has written the entire letter toward the goal of communicating that nothing more is coming, BUT has cleverly selected one of the alternatives to identify the buyer that concurrently 1) actively deceives the general public and 2) quietly confirms a buyout to more astute investors?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
