InvestorsHub Logo

trader59

02/06/20 10:48 PM

#99469 RE: iron-eagle #99466

LOL!!
Not the blooming mail servers again... irrelevant.

The STA agreement was with Reverdia, IIRC, and LCYB elected not to take on that agreement.
If you'll read through the 6th monitor's report, page 37, it gives the details of all 11 bids received. 2 companies bid on all 3 lots of assets, aka - the "business as a whole," the others did not. There were no bids for the shares of the company at all. It's all there, always has been, just needs to be read and not ignored.
Yes, the companies operations were the Sarnia plant, and it was sold. The company was not.

How many times must the monitor state that only the assets of the company were sold to the JV, and that there was no transaction for the shares for it to be believed? Just curious.

Groundskeep

02/07/20 5:01 AM

#99481 RE: iron-eagle #99466

HOLY $heeeet!!!!

LETSWIN2020

02/07/20 6:32 AM

#99482 RE: iron-eagle #99466

Ok yawn

iron-eagle

08/14/20 11:42 PM

#107334 RE: iron-eagle #99466

Looks like reality is finally setting in that this is a JV with Bioamber. I mean how can you resume "the operations of the Petitioners" without the Petitioner's involvement?? Better brush up on the Section 167 Election or just read the "snippets" from this earlier post. LOL resume the operations of the Petitioners and yet the Petitioner's don't exist??? Now that is blue sky pinky land fantasy at its best!