InvestorsHub Logo

136

02/05/20 3:09 PM

#1541 RE: SolidInvestment #1538

I really don't see my post as "idiotic" or whatever else you want to call it.

What I said was literally a very logical speculation on the issue.

Besides, it's not Ian's responsibility to be there. That's why he has retained a lawyer for these proceedings. If you want someone to be upset with don't let it be me or Ian, be upset with the lawyer.

lumpy9200

02/06/20 8:11 AM

#1544 RE: SolidInvestment #1538

Who's to say it was Dixon that was the issue? I see nothing to suggest this was his "fault" (don't see anything that says it's anyone's fault actually)

Mr Ian Dixon had over a month to prepare and do something and could of had a five dollar flunkie submit something to the courts.



And 136's post could be correct. Not sure why it would be called a "stupid a-- post". We have no idea why the parties didn't show, so one of them being sick or unable to make it for any reason is as reasonable a guess as any other. Sick, death in the family, etc. Judge gets notified the night before or that morning, tells the other party, and the whole thing gets pushed back a week.