Replies to post #589614 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Barron4664]

Obit,

As always this is just my opinion. I feel that Judge Sweeny’s opinion in the Sammons case when she was directed by the Appeals Court to address Sammons Claim seemed to be an argument for protecting her jurisdiction rather than addressing whether or not an Article I tribunal created in the 1980s to handle 5th ammendment claims is constitutional. This opinion should have been addressed by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. They remanded the question back to Sweeny to address. Seems no one wants to address the Constitutional Issue at hand that Congress created in their so called reform. Why would this argument even be addressed by her? Seems a conflict of interest.