InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Cal187

01/29/20 5:15 PM

#3474 RE: stervc #3473

Many thanks Sterling for pointing this out. These PE ratios take $PNNX valuation to Billions.
icon url

Wellwhatdoyaknow

01/29/20 5:29 PM

#3475 RE: stervc #3473

Thanks Sterling for pointing that out. I suggest everyone do the math with any of those numbers. Post if you want or just have fun running them again. :-)
icon url

War Shark

01/29/20 6:57 PM

#3476 RE: stervc #3473

These numbers are astounding
icon url

ramalio

01/29/20 7:25 PM

#3478 RE: stervc #3473

stervc, did some math (admittedly for fun) with your 4 different PE-numbers which I mixed and got an average of 103, replaced then Cal's originally used 8 with this 103= and got the (insane) pps of USD 483.
Just laughing about it because that's a 611-bagger from the current pps. A number/multiple which you not even on highly pumped/pumping stocks/boards can find. Even 10 percent of that looking unrealistic. As I said, MEL* needed numerous long years to get there. So it may be funny but also unserious to do such speculations. Not blaming you but me who just wrote this very post. LOL
icon url

Stock Logics

01/30/20 8:41 AM

#3487 RE: stervc #3473

Has everyone done the math using the conservative PE ratio of 35?? Let's all share our results. Who is first??