InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

2014shelby

01/24/20 4:16 PM

#50387 RE: breewski #50386

Are you suggesting that after all the efforts and big hype for 5+ years not much, if any, growth in shareholders equity will come from the VLN IP, FDA approvals, etc but rather most likely will result in a loss for LT shareholders?
icon url

breewski

01/24/20 4:47 PM

#50388 RE: breewski #50386

Depends what your are looking for for sp. Short term we will get a bounce to $3 or $4 but until we start capturing the cig market I don't think we are going to $8 to $12 based on cigs alone. The original mandate would have been a different story. I admit like an idiot I though that the FDA was going to deliver that. I was calling Gottlieb my hero for crying out loud. I have watched my Dad slowly kill himself over the years with nicotine addiction. My grandmother died of copd and smoked right until the day she died and a favorite Aunt of mine is going through the same thing right now. Believe me I hope I'm wrong I've been holding onto most of my shares since 2013, always afraid to cash out for fear of missing out. I have made some trades and made a little $$ but nothing to really brag about. I mean come on there are some forces at work keeping this down. Maybe it is down because of CEO turnover but I don't buy it.

I'll end with this, for all we have going for us right now even without the original mandate we should be double or triple this sp.
icon url

nonameface13

01/25/20 10:23 AM

#50397 RE: breewski #50386

I think this is why Cliff had said in his first CC... hemp/cannabis can be potentially "more lucrative" ... in near term context... if I recall correctly...

Doesn't matter to me; how awesome is it that FDA approved our cigs? None other in past 10 years...

I say we get MRTP, and so does PM's IQOS... inside dealings are happening... PM is on board w/ VLN IMO