Replies to post #86985 on Lehman Brothers Financial SA (LEHNQ)

[stockmojo9]

jersey,

<<I bought before that date.

I bought after that date.

I expect it ALL to be made good.>>

I know you did, jersey, and so did I.

Is it fair to us?

I don't think it is fair having to stay around for over 11 years now when Marsal said they were going to be out after 2.

Now watch an A&M attorney post they've technically been out of BK and are in Administration even though each operating report says they are still in BK.

It is why I've proposed restitution and a settlement structure.

Even if the impaired shares received FV and the pre-impaired shares split everything else (cumulative payments, penalties of all CT shares), it would be more fair to the pre-impaired +/-20M CT shareholders out of the 48M CT shares trading.

This way, the Trustee settle the two classes based on acquisition date identified by the Court: One amount goes to shares prior to January 2012 and the FV goes to shares bought after.

However, the Estate & Courts have to determine the "impairment."

The Courts went ahead with their POR & stays beyond the 5 year Deferment Period allowed in the prospectus. They know they have to trade the CTs for the NOL tax credits.

IMHO, they should not be showing they are paying taxes on the last Operating Statement.

Good luck.

mojo