InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

yellowjacket

12/06/06 8:04 PM

#102400 RE: ss9173 #102398

SS9173: "Thoughts?" Yes, only one...is management listening (and taking appropriate action)? YJ.
icon url

GONEOM

12/06/06 9:10 PM

#102409 RE: ss9173 #102398

ss, great thoughts...always appreciate your input, analysis of things here at the asylum..

GONEOM
icon url

beacon27

12/06/06 10:11 PM

#102414 RE: ss9173 #102398

SS. I agree 110%.

My first reaction to your post was that IF NEOMs sales and marketing team havent already been knocking down Yahoo, Googles, MSFTs etc doors already, then they dont deserve to be in their current positions.

My 10 yr old nephew would understand who would be the obvious marketing targets for qode.

If we get a response from Management of "Gee, great idea...." then I will fall over on the spot!

I think a 12 mnth exclusive contract with a yahoo etc, and thereafter, auction it off amongst all the search companies. Perhaps, exclusive thru zones, areas,regions, countries....????

There are more well equipped experts than me to make that call.

Good post all the same SS.
icon url

Drmyke3

12/06/06 10:18 PM

#102418 RE: ss9173 #102398

No ss9173!! Let NEOM follow the lead of Wi-Lan (WIN on TSX). Wi-Lan already licenced to Cisco after a court case. A few weeks ago Wi-Lan said to the telecommunications industry "licence us now for a low price or pay more later".
Two days ago Nokia licenced Wi-Lan's wi-max patents for $50,000,000.00
Wi-lan says there are ANOTHER 140 COMPANIES THAT WILL NEED TO LICENCE!!! Oh, WIN was up 65% in one day!!!

ss9173, let's have NEOM dso the same thing-- all ad agencies, brands, web portals, and any other company is free to licence white-labelled qode. Anyone and everyone can buy a keyword, imo.

Dr. Mike