Replies to post #102372 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[Steelers_Fan]

Brew -

http://www.neom.com/press_releases/2005/20051019.jsp

"...In addition NeoMedia's Patent Infringement suit against Scanbuy, also filed in 2004, remains pending. The Complaint for Patent Infringement and Damages, which was originally filed in the U.S. States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, was moved to the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York and also is being heard by Judge Sprizzo.

NeoMedia's Complaint claims infringement by Scanbuy on four valid and subsisting patents owned by NeoMedia - U.S. Patents No. 5,933,829, No. 5,978,773, No. 6,108,656, and No. 6,199,048."

Here is the PR from when the case was dismissed in Illinois and re-filed in NY:

http://www.neom.com/press_releases/2004/20040421.jsp

[success622]

No, it was exactly the same. Only issue w/ the Illinois case was it was filed in Illinois. The 4 patents I posted earlier were taken from the NY filings.;

[clawmann]

Brew: My post concerned the case in the Southern District of New York, which is quite live. That case was filed after the Illinois case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

[beacon27]

Brewski, what is your take on SRM's dot connecting?

Interested to hear your thoughts.