Replies to post #60011 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

The USPTO application was misleading too. They......

have until the end of next month to respond to the priority action notice or the application is dead.

Specifically they claimed "first use in commerce" last May, but even the paid promos didn't claim use in commerce.

The second option should be used. That way they can kept Tinkerbell 2.0 hidden from the sheeple.

Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class:

(1) Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use. A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.” The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement.

(2) Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required. This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a specimen.

http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88449647&docId=PAT20190826182144#docIndex=0&page=1