Replies to post #83646 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[ih8aloss]

I don't think anything productive ever developed from those.

[Kurt_Banoffee]

It says the application was a provisional. I can't find any applications under their name nor do they mention any patents/application in their last annual report other than the one they licensed from Rice U. Maybe they they never filed a full application because they later found the Merck patents?

[drugmanrx]

See it is not just QMC.

Dotz Nano is making less money than ever and investors are p*ssed
March 29,2019

https://stockhead.com.au/tech/dotz-nano-is-making-less-money-than-ever-and-investors-are-pssed/

Who to believe?

In an interview with Stockhead earlier this year, Dotz’ new-ish CEO Uzi Breier said the company was turning a corner.

But he’s got his work cut out to make people believe that.

At the start of January, Dotz made its “first” sale into the plastics industry.

But investors with long memories will know the company signed a deal to sell into that sector two years ago.

So should shareholders believe this announcement? Or the first one? Or, indeed, any that have come in between?

[Jamis1]

With respect to 2017 application, I have looked at it yet and we don’t have QMC’s, but is there a difference between their blockchain claim and blockchain with distributed ledgers in 2019?

I don’t have enough understanding as to time table of the various evolutions within blockchain and for that matter what QMC or Dotz claimed in their patents. Could be two very different uses of blockchain for all we know. Clearly their patent was using Grahame qdots which is likely a big difference from what QMC has been developing.