InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rodman

01/05/20 7:15 AM

#83291 RE: shoondale #83289

QTMM $5++ Its time!
rod
icon url

Solar_Express

01/05/20 10:29 AM

#83292 RE: shoondale #83289

Actually yes we know they received 1/2M and a Letter of Credit for 1M for the 2 Reactors. Anything else stated is speculation because we do not know due to their filing situation.

Can you answer what is India going to do with 2 reactors and why are they there?
icon url

drugmanrx

01/05/20 11:26 AM

#83293 RE: shoondale #83289

Did you read the SEC filings or responses to your post?

drugmanrx Sunday, 12/29/19 09:14:11 AM
Re: shoondale post# 82973 0
Post # of 83292

From that 10q referenced:

On or about December 23, 2018, Assam Electronics Development Corporation LTD (an Indian government enterprise involved in the development of the manufacturing facility in India) paid the first investment of $1M USD into the overall project fund. Amtronics then transferred a $500K USD commitment fee to the group that has secured the $20M investment funding. In terms of direct funding, the Company received a $500,000 payment from Amtron/Amtronics in March 2019. The Indian monetary system has layers of oversight and approvals for international remittance of funds which the Company believes caused the delay of the payment from the previously reported schedule. In order to avoid similar delays in the future, Amtron/Amtronics have informed the Company that they are in the process of issuing a letter of credit for the balance of funds owing for the license fee as well as equipment purchases. The Company believes that once this letter of credit is in place it will provide more timely payments going forward. In the meantime, the Company has proceeded readying the production equipment in order to maintain project momentum.



Now concerning "Two hires have not served any constructive purpose for QMC almost 5 months into their jobs."

Where is your proof?

Here is my proof why I think you are wrong.

Hartigan was hired by QTMM Sept 2019, the lawsuit below not until 11/12/2019. If Intiva Health was concerned only about a confidentiality agreement the lawsuit would have been filed immediately after his departure, but if Hartigan was trying to steal some of Intiva Health clients it would explain the suit being filed 2 months later to try and stop him.

jefra1965 Sunday, 12/01/19 12:03:30 PM
Re: BigE1960 post# 81525 0
Post # of 83292

This raises many questions.

1. How broad was the Intiva Health & Hartigan confidentiality agreement?

2. How similar are their technology? Intiva H & QMC.

3. Can Hartigan continue working with QMC in the mean time? He was served on Nov. 13 and he presented a webinar on Nov 19th.

4. The injunction hearing was canceled. Did they reach a new agreement on Nov 22 and finished this matter by Nov26 ?

------------------------------------------------------------------
EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
11/12/2019 Court's Docket Sheet
11/12/2019 Plaintiffs Original Petition (Open Case)
for Temporary Restraining Order, Injunction, and Req for Disclosure
11/12/2019 Request for Issuance of Process Quantum Materials Corp. C/M
11/12/2019 Request for Issuance of Process John Hartigan
11/12/2019 Request for Issuance of Process John Hartigan (TRO)
11/12/2019 Request for Issuance of Process
Quantum Materials Corp. c/o Registered Agent - Craig Lindberg (TRO)
11/12/2019 Temporary Restraining Order (Before Original Judgment) (Judicial Officer: Junkin, David )
11/12/2019
11/12/2019
Citation
Quantum Materials Corp.
Hartigan, John
TRO Writ
Quantum Materials Corp.
Unserved

11/13/2019 11/13/2019
Hartigan, John .....Served
11/12/2019 Cash Bond (Rule 684 T.R.C.P.)
11/13/2019 Affidavit of Service/Return Of Service John Hartigan - Citation
11/13/2019 Affidavit of Service/Return Of Service
John Hartigan - TRO
11/14/2019 Motion..... Emergency Motion to Dissolve TRO Entered w/out Notice
11/14/2019 Proposed Order Received..... Order on Defendant's Emergency Motion to Dissolve TRO
11/19/2019 Request
Defendant's Request for Hearing Pursuant to TRCP 680
11/21/2019 Motion to Dissolve Hearing (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Junkin, David)
11/21/2019 Motion To Set November 22, 2019 at 1pm
11/21/2019 Motion To Set November 21, 2019 at 1pm
11/22/2019 Motion to Dissolve Hearing (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Junkin, David)
11/22/2019 Motion to Seal Record(s)
11/22/2019 Proposed Order Received ....Order Sealing Court Records
11/22/2019 Response P's Response on TRO & Motion to Modify
11/22/2019 Proposed Order Received
11/22/2019 Amended TRO and Order Setting Hearing for Temp and/or Perm Injunction Motion to Temporarily Seal Court Records filed by Plaintiff
11/22/2019 Proposed Order Received Order Temporarily Sealing Court Records and Setting Hearing
11/22/2019 Temporary Restraining Order (Before Original Judgment) (Judicial Officer: Junkin, David ) Modified (and/or Permanent Injunction)
11/22/2019 Agreed Order (Judicial Officer: Junkin, David ) Agreed Confidentiality & PO
11/26/2019 CANCELED Temporary Injunction Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Junkin, David) Other
12/12/2019 Temporary Injunction Hearing (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Junkin, David)

public.co.hays.tx.us/default.aspx
Case 19-2774




States they are talking to potential clients.