InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Donotunderstand

12/28/19 12:13 PM

#584646 RE: camaro4me #584640

fine
can agree

but I do not think the current case - in discovery - in front of Lamberth is the first plaintiff re petitioning
icon url

skeptic7

12/28/19 2:51 PM

#584650 RE: camaro4me #584640

Assess all the damages you want, they won't get paid, they will get appealed and the Treasury will continue to plow ahead unfettered. BY allowing Mnuchin to continue DJT has become no better than his predecessor who started this financial fraud and illegal theft via NWS on the GSE's and taxpayers. Rule of Law is meaningless when being asked to do so against the US Government. Government is playing the long game with unlimited resources to do so, this will be in Courts in perpetuity.
icon url

bcde

12/29/19 12:02 AM

#584669 RE: camaro4me #584640

"It's called Fraud on the Court, and yes the plaintiffs get to present the false statements, and if ruling decision is warranted, damages can be assessed, such as removing an attorney from the bar."

You are correct.