InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Letgoofmyfannie

12/20/19 3:38 PM

#584055 RE: YanksGhost #584054

Oh come on, Yank, you know whom you're reckoning with around here; in these fact resistant times, this is one of Fanniezeit Fredgeist's most prominent echo chambers
icon url

955

12/20/19 4:05 PM

#584059 RE: YanksGhost #584054

You're right. Got too caught up in the urgency to raise capital aspect of their letter. Good catch.




I am astounded to hear support for the Community Lenders position. Fisrt they say the SPS should be retired because all of the payments under the SPSPA made in senior dividends exceed the contractual 10% as stipulated. Then they go on to obsrerve that the 79.9% warrants are valid ans proper.

This view is certainly not favorable for common shareholders holding on for some, eventual payday.






icon url

Donotunderstand

12/20/19 4:21 PM

#584063 RE: YanksGhost #584054

why not ?

if the overall view is SPS is paid off

capital to be raised via holding on to profits

even a 4:1 dilution leaves us 12-15
icon url

FNM500K

12/21/19 12:50 AM

#584109 RE: YanksGhost #584054

Community Lenders...Ahh yes. The same folks who helped contribute to the meltdown of the housing market just over a decade ago. I can only imagine that Mnuchin and the folks at UST are shaking in their boots after reading their letter.

Please!

$$FNMA$$
icon url

Lite

12/21/19 9:14 AM

#584122 RE: YanksGhost #584054

It’s ironic that Congress deliberately held back from releasing the GSEs (by fixing) so that no one could reap a profit, not caring about a ‘takings’ issue..

—-

This view is certainly not favorable for common shareholders holding on for some, eventual payday.

—-