InvestorsHub Logo

Fortuno

12/17/19 12:11 PM

#50703 RE: The Lawman #50701

I agree 100%.

We'll probably learn very little today.

Four years of holding these have brought me nothing but frustration and disappointment.
Oh yes, and financial losses. Thank you.

PNW_Ironman

12/17/19 12:18 PM

#50704 RE: The Lawman #50701

I can visualize Nader hitting the “delete” button as soon as he read #6.....

penniestodimes

12/17/19 1:02 PM

#50706 RE: The Lawman #50701

Nice job! I like it. All very valid points.

Amatuer17

12/17/19 1:09 PM

#50707 RE: The Lawman #50701

Very direct and valid questions.

Typically most CEO would ignore it - I will not be surprised if NP addresses some of them.

finesand

12/17/19 2:59 PM

#50710 RE: The Lawman #50701

The reason the non-binding agreement's more than excellent NBA was later debated as potentially not bringing in the best SH value?

Perhaps?

AFAIK NP used this notion before putting it on hold - or when he was doing so. Rendering the NBA or partner as 'not good enough'?

This was his (IMHO) logical mistake in shifting around the narrative.

But I will be all ears listening to the continuation of our 'dear soap opera'. BTW .. nice buys despite the situation.

Merry Christmas