InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

supernova23

12/08/19 1:21 PM

#202 RE: Scumbag Fraudsters #201

What I meant by "simple science":

The Company’s products take advantage of the exceptional physical properties of carbon. Carbon in diamond form is one of the most thermally conductive materials (~2,000 W/m-K) on earth, being 5X and 8X more thermally conductive than copper and aluminum, respectively. In carbon fiber form, overall thermal conductivity can approach the extraordinary level of diamond when configured as a dense array of vertically aligned carbon fibers to increase surface area (Source: “Carbon Fiber Overcomes Electronic and Thermal Design Challenges”, Tirias Research). This is KULR’s core technology. This material (in various forms) can effectively be utilized to transfer or dissipate heat generated by electronics and batteries.

To the best of my knowledge, KULR has only licensed the Internal Short Circuit (ISC) from NREL and NASA and most recently the Fractional Thermal Runaway Calorimeter (FTRC) from NASA. Various products have been "co-developed" with NASA from the standpoint that NASA has assisted KULR with testing and analysis of KULR's products such as the Thermal Runaway Shield (TRS). However, KULR owns the IP on TRS.

KULR's has affiliations with world-class organizations including NASA, Leidos, and Lockheed Martin. Furthermore, the Company has presented at many of the thermal management (electronics and batteries) industry's important conferences and events. Carbon fiber thermal management ("simple material science") based solutions have real potential to displace traditional less effective solutions as increasing power demands of electronics and batteries require improved heat dissipation solutions. The question of concern isn't whether KULR is real or not. I know the Company is real. The real concern lies in the extent to which KULR is able to commercialize its electronics and battery cooling products in a meaningful way and indeed overtake competing solutions over time. Only in hindsight is a technology considered disruptive.