Yes it is sort of semantics, and full-scale does have a definition. Full-scale is a metric which usually is compared to an original. If you are the only original in existence, you are not wrong to use it to describe KBLB's production. If you want to compare our silk to typical silk, then you have a metric with which to compare to an original. Using this 2nd method, is deliberately or accidentally down playing what KBLB has. The holy grail of some in the molecular sciences, is mass production of Spider Silk, not typical silk. So this argument is, in one way or another, downplaying or ignoring the science that KBLB has been endeavoring to accomplish for many years.
KBLB is the only company in existence that is using silkworms to make super strong and more elastic silks. They would be the only possible original, with which you could possibly compare scale. The use of full scale is correct, and Bob could not be wrong in this respect. If they were competing with typical silk producers exclusively, then you could compare to a different original exclusively. Our first customer is likely going to make something to show the military. That is a whole new market to go along with the newness of this DS 2.0 fiber.