Perhaps, I guess it was a remark of frustration, not jealousy. Marketing strategies are different.
But backstory: as in all stories there is good and bad. Just tired of bad being the stuff highlighted by most posters here and from other releases (SA). Most news releases shedding bad light have OLD data and info. Very few bother to look up current company information.
Just so tired of slants, not only here but elsewhere as well.
Me thinks not. Cw is run by a lying CEO and scam founders. You're getting overheated by that cash bonfire and it clouds you're judgment. As for the 1/2 pump...followed by the 1/2 bash, I'm kinda glad CV wasn't associated, as now viewers will quickly associate that bash with the CW co. that was pumped minutes before. I wouldn't want to be holding there at Q4 when the music stops, lots of bagholders will be left standing.
False. Board members (In both) can invest in any company they want or both. There has been plenty discussion here about several issues in both companies.
Mixed. CWEB valuation and recent success is tied to the backstory but SCIENCE will prevail going forward. I don't think that CWEB is investing enough in Science only in cultivation expansion which is double edge and dangerous. Two things to proof my point: 1. Very low R&D expense. And 2. Lack of regulatory stance and presence.
True
The true financial story is that the founders of CVSI built this company from NOTHING. 3 years ago (2016) was operating cash $2M in RED with under $1M of cash available and still selling $11M in products. Now CVSI holds $14M in the coffers and sold $58M in the past 12 months. No fraud anywhere and all that BS will be cleared soon. Investors will see the company for what it really is. A COMPLETE SUCCESS story so far without a little sick girl back story. I say so far because we are depending on regulations.
Then you have to wonder how and why......Great business model, science and VERY SMART MANAGEMENT.