Share holders votes meant nothing here Marco and the board had enough votes via preferred share voting rights to do anything they wanted. And still do.
The reverse split and other clauses were approved by a vote that reflected The insiders dominant number of shares . Yes some people were led by Marco's recommendations ;but the vote was not overwhelming as Marco stated It reflected a LARGE PORTION OF REJECTION; but could not overcome the boards DOMINANT majority of shares . The dominant number of shares were GIFTED TO THE BOARD MEMBERS OVER TIME as bonuses and discounted purchases with little to NO money exchange-This occurred over time and left little to NO ability for DD to rectify ,other than selling . Those who flipped at proper times made money ;but the bag holders -who believed Marco's LAPSIS EXILLUS did not
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
