InvestorsHub Logo

finesand

11/11/19 3:08 AM

#48800 RE: weasel6667 #48796

weasel, good point. This is one reason why I would prefer NP to give his expectations all in written. The lack thereof motivates my & friends to at least put all these important talks on youtube having the auto transcript at least.

One debate I had was that NP simply needs to pump the story a little, otherwise funding sources would dry out. This is surely one important role of a CEO. For NP's own sake I hope that at least the NBA was real. Negotiations could also be supported by emails in a discovery phase. So he probably was or still is negotiating.
In the end, of course he must be negotiating about all of this - this is his job just a few months apart from potential sales.

It surely is not supportive if all these negotiations do not succeed.

It is also not well supporting if NP changes goals so often.
At least they stick to HIV-1 first now.

You:

There were some significant steps forward in the medical field but financials were and are a total disaster.


Yes, that is why SP is where it is I guess.

I am sure all longs can agree with that.
Mind boggling.. like a puzzle which just doesn't want to match.

Me:

In this sense the risk lies more in cash raising capabilities and ability to get a commercialization deal signed than anything else IMHO.
Conversely, the potential partners who withdrew from negotiations saw their risks and potential losses being higher than the potential allowed by the terms in negotiations.



I would say, we might not have found the actual reason - missing piece of this puzzle yet.

When I get to this point, I always fall back to the mighty BP conspiracy. Probably like the Barbarians were afraid of lightning (o8>